Ned, I’m concerned with what you wrote and am curious how you came to your conclusion about the Left. Why do you think that there is, as you represented, an almost religious obsession with big government? It’s interesting to me also that you believe that there is little to no common ground to find with people who disagree with you. Why do you believe that? I also find it interesting that you take the position that people who disagree with your conservative viewpoint are unAmerican. How did you come to that conclusion?
And the structural solution involves reclaiming and wresting control from those who now control it. And teaching people how to do it via www.precinctstrategy.com
Due respect, but that seems to me to be only a way to address some of the corruption in local elections. It does not address the problems of the swamp, which already has unlimited resources and an army of lobbyists, influence peddlers and other powerful backers who look at every new congressman or senator as just the latest crop of pretenders. They will very quickly correct his starry eyed notion that he's there to serve the people by explaining who is really in charge, and the consequences for not toeing the line.
Yes, but it's the precinct committee people (the contact link to the voters) who directly endorse/elect municipal, county officials, state representatives, and US Congressmen/women, as well as the State Committee responsible for electing State party officials and statewide candidates. A conservative precinct committee will elect conservative candidates for higher office. You are right about the corrupt Uniparty swamp; it will take men and women of bold conviction and courage to drain the Swamp and buck the corruption. I can't say we will achieve this lofty goal but we have to start by wresting back control in every precinct, every county, and every state.
My point though, is why waste time, energy, resources and hope in a strategy that has a near-zero chance of actually making a difference against the Leviathan? Watch the video at tacticalcivics.com, and pay special attention to the two enforcement mechanisms of County Grand Jury and well regulated militia. The former investigates crime and has the power to indict, the latter ensures law enforcement is legal and involves every well armed responsible citizen. Then look into the still-pending first right, which would be a radical game changer, and only requires an up or down simple majority vote - no veto possible. I’m talking about it here because the plan would fit seamlessly into what Ned talks about here, and make both approaches more effective. I think the precinct level stuff would be much more valuable as part of a big picture plan to dismantle the deep state, and restore the lawful order of the Republic.
You’ve defined a structural problem in our self-governing processes. That’s why coming up with a structural solution like that suggested by the Convention of States is exactly the kind of solution we need at this point.
The COS folks would have you believe we can convene a constitutional convention and limit it to only a small part of it. But once you start the sausage making machinery, it is highly to produce a mother lode of unintended consequences.
Ned, your concerns may be misplaced. For some reason, conservatives are drawn to the antics of the useful idiots, elected or otherwise, that distract from the quest for money and power hidden from cameras and podcasts. Just because Trump won and conservatism appears ascendant does not mean those manning the levers of power and commerce are going to give up their privileged positions at the public trough, decades in the making. The fools that actual believe this leftist tripe are just cannon fodder, along with their enablers in media, politics and government, each carving off their own little slice of the pie, oblivious to the impending trainwreck. Our government, its consultants, elected and unelected officials, prime contractors and service providers constitute a titanic money laundering operation and Ponzi scheme -- the leviathan in the room. And its beneficiaries will not relinquish their power without an equally titanic fight that our country may not survive.
I found this to be a bit incongruent. Everything after the first two sentences I agree with. But in what sense does any of that support the idea that Ned's concerns may be misplaced? My concerns, along with the ones Ned so clearly laid out in the documentary, are that the globalists actually believe that there are too many people on the planet, and the only solution is to reduce the number of them. Not by a little, but by billions. They've enjoyed some success lately with COVID, geoengineering, etc. and they have bigger plans ready to roll out imminently. If they don't succeed in killing us first, the best plan out there for restoring what the founders gave us can be found at tacticalcivics.com. I believe what Ned has laid out is a near perfect match with their perspective of exactly what the problem is. The difference is that TC has a full spectrum plan to restore out Constitutional Republic.
While i totally agree with you about the designs of leftists, dont you think a minority are the zealots that are leading the majority? I have joined the Society of Problem Solvers and Swarm Academy to build a parallel government platformed on transparency and mutual trust to subsume the old corrupted government. What think you?
Never heard of either one. You might want to provide a little detail on who they are, what their mission is, and whether it includes solutions rather than just education.
Ned, I’m concerned with what you wrote and am curious how you came to your conclusion about the Left. Why do you think that there is, as you represented, an almost religious obsession with big government? It’s interesting to me also that you believe that there is little to no common ground to find with people who disagree with you. Why do you believe that? I also find it interesting that you take the position that people who disagree with your conservative viewpoint are unAmerican. How did you come to that conclusion?
And the structural solution involves reclaiming and wresting control from those who now control it. And teaching people how to do it via www.precinctstrategy.com
Due respect, but that seems to me to be only a way to address some of the corruption in local elections. It does not address the problems of the swamp, which already has unlimited resources and an army of lobbyists, influence peddlers and other powerful backers who look at every new congressman or senator as just the latest crop of pretenders. They will very quickly correct his starry eyed notion that he's there to serve the people by explaining who is really in charge, and the consequences for not toeing the line.
Yes, but it's the precinct committee people (the contact link to the voters) who directly endorse/elect municipal, county officials, state representatives, and US Congressmen/women, as well as the State Committee responsible for electing State party officials and statewide candidates. A conservative precinct committee will elect conservative candidates for higher office. You are right about the corrupt Uniparty swamp; it will take men and women of bold conviction and courage to drain the Swamp and buck the corruption. I can't say we will achieve this lofty goal but we have to start by wresting back control in every precinct, every county, and every state.
My point though, is why waste time, energy, resources and hope in a strategy that has a near-zero chance of actually making a difference against the Leviathan? Watch the video at tacticalcivics.com, and pay special attention to the two enforcement mechanisms of County Grand Jury and well regulated militia. The former investigates crime and has the power to indict, the latter ensures law enforcement is legal and involves every well armed responsible citizen. Then look into the still-pending first right, which would be a radical game changer, and only requires an up or down simple majority vote - no veto possible. I’m talking about it here because the plan would fit seamlessly into what Ned talks about here, and make both approaches more effective. I think the precinct level stuff would be much more valuable as part of a big picture plan to dismantle the deep state, and restore the lawful order of the Republic.
Thanks for the links. I will check it out and may have a question or two later. I'm open to whatever will work in tandem or alone...
You’ve defined a structural problem in our self-governing processes. That’s why coming up with a structural solution like that suggested by the Convention of States is exactly the kind of solution we need at this point.
The COS folks would have you believe we can convene a constitutional convention and limit it to only a small part of it. But once you start the sausage making machinery, it is highly to produce a mother lode of unintended consequences.
The Convention of States is being pushed by the very people seeking to destroy our Constitution.
Ned, your concerns may be misplaced. For some reason, conservatives are drawn to the antics of the useful idiots, elected or otherwise, that distract from the quest for money and power hidden from cameras and podcasts. Just because Trump won and conservatism appears ascendant does not mean those manning the levers of power and commerce are going to give up their privileged positions at the public trough, decades in the making. The fools that actual believe this leftist tripe are just cannon fodder, along with their enablers in media, politics and government, each carving off their own little slice of the pie, oblivious to the impending trainwreck. Our government, its consultants, elected and unelected officials, prime contractors and service providers constitute a titanic money laundering operation and Ponzi scheme -- the leviathan in the room. And its beneficiaries will not relinquish their power without an equally titanic fight that our country may not survive.
I found this to be a bit incongruent. Everything after the first two sentences I agree with. But in what sense does any of that support the idea that Ned's concerns may be misplaced? My concerns, along with the ones Ned so clearly laid out in the documentary, are that the globalists actually believe that there are too many people on the planet, and the only solution is to reduce the number of them. Not by a little, but by billions. They've enjoyed some success lately with COVID, geoengineering, etc. and they have bigger plans ready to roll out imminently. If they don't succeed in killing us first, the best plan out there for restoring what the founders gave us can be found at tacticalcivics.com. I believe what Ned has laid out is a near perfect match with their perspective of exactly what the problem is. The difference is that TC has a full spectrum plan to restore out Constitutional Republic.
While i totally agree with you about the designs of leftists, dont you think a minority are the zealots that are leading the majority? I have joined the Society of Problem Solvers and Swarm Academy to build a parallel government platformed on transparency and mutual trust to subsume the old corrupted government. What think you?
Never heard of either one. You might want to provide a little detail on who they are, what their mission is, and whether it includes solutions rather than just education.