consider the so-called Declaration of Independence...
It was in fact a Declaration of Unilateral Abrogation of
Imperial Colonial Branch Operation Agreements
The colonies started on pretty tenuous economic grounds
and came close to collapse / default / abandonment
The growth of cash-crops like cotton (which was initially cultivated by white indentured immigrants
but given the high rate of demise due to malaria in the hot fetid swamps hence the need to import black slaves from malaria-ridden regions in Afrika for their immunity)
and tobacco - (deliberately targetted at the unwashed hordes because of its addictive nature)
succeeded
Loan agreements were made and undertakings to the Crown and special dispensations and commitments of Military force to "soften up the locals"
Once the economics were stable and profitable, the colonials resented paying the tributes to the Crown and at some point summarily decided to "Pull It"
Of course it was expedient to wrap all that in bullshit sophistry about "taxation without representation"
Look you monkeys - you were colonials - wards of the crown - the most unwashed of the unwashed hordes and somehow feel entitled to TheVote and stuff ?
Of course The RedCoats are Coming The RedCoats are Coming - to enforce the colonial branch operation agreements - just like if a McDonalds franchisee decided he didn't "need" HQ any more
I notice that the UI does not lend itself to "long" posts... it positions the active entry live below the bottom edge of the screen - hence nudging commenters to multiple short posts
The Founding Fathers were of the Rentier Class whose primary objective was to be at the bleeding edge of the Imperial Colonial resource extraction exploitation racket to profit the Crown and the Financiers in London
it is a grave error to attribute the (ulterior) motives of those who are motivated
and driven to grasp the Brass Ring of public power to "human nature"
The sweeps of his-story are not driven by "human nature" at all but by the
proclivities habituations preferences and psychosociopathies of the tiny elites
who fraudulently maneuver and manipulate their way into positions of power
in order to abuse that power to leverage their personal and ideological psychopathies
over millions of people.
The founders did not read his-story to be better founders or governors, but to engage
in their narcissistic egotistical dick-wagging
If their "reading of his-story" led them to:
Fraudulently portray "We the People" as pertaining to or even representing the unwashed hordes...
when in fact that term referred to the wealthy white male property-owning slave-owning members of the rentier class who participated in the whole Imperial Colonial project ...
Not as is claimed to "heroically cross the waters to the Promised Land and even more heroically
hew a civilization from the wilderness in order to provide a Land of Liberty and Prosperity for people who could flee the old world tyrannies
It quickly becomes evident that their reading and education was in the art of sophistry and fabrication
Political order depends less on universal agreement than on a settled answer to one question: who gets the final word when agreement fails?
https://youtu.be/HOktqY5wY4A?si=srCSp1Is47JiI0Zm
https://youtu.be/J_qop7tNvh8?si=HFRfxy8rLr8YFdOX
https://youtu.be/9LziHIBUOUA?si=r8w2tHstECle2IKC
consider the so-called Declaration of Independence...
It was in fact a Declaration of Unilateral Abrogation of
Imperial Colonial Branch Operation Agreements
The colonies started on pretty tenuous economic grounds
and came close to collapse / default / abandonment
The growth of cash-crops like cotton (which was initially cultivated by white indentured immigrants
but given the high rate of demise due to malaria in the hot fetid swamps hence the need to import black slaves from malaria-ridden regions in Afrika for their immunity)
and tobacco - (deliberately targetted at the unwashed hordes because of its addictive nature)
succeeded
Loan agreements were made and undertakings to the Crown and special dispensations and commitments of Military force to "soften up the locals"
Once the economics were stable and profitable, the colonials resented paying the tributes to the Crown and at some point summarily decided to "Pull It"
Of course it was expedient to wrap all that in bullshit sophistry about "taxation without representation"
Look you monkeys - you were colonials - wards of the crown - the most unwashed of the unwashed hordes and somehow feel entitled to TheVote and stuff ?
Of course The RedCoats are Coming The RedCoats are Coming - to enforce the colonial branch operation agreements - just like if a McDonalds franchisee decided he didn't "need" HQ any more
as I recall the phrase
"we hold it as self evident that all men (sic) are created equal"
is immediately followed by the enumeration of all the ways in
which all men (and women) are decidedly unequal and disequal
More fraudulent sophistry and propaganda
A simple way to clearly make a break from the Old World Tyranny
would have been to not just import and enact the whole pile
of Brrrritisch legalese gibberish and lawforms without any effort to
implement and enact any of the high-minded "stuff"
Grant women equality from the get-go would have been a giant middle-finger to the limeys, eh ?
NOPE!! refused to do it. They were after all United Empire Loyalists at "heart"
I notice that the UI does not lend itself to "long" posts... it positions the active entry live below the bottom edge of the screen - hence nudging commenters to multiple short posts
The Founding Fathers were of the Rentier Class whose primary objective was to be at the bleeding edge of the Imperial Colonial resource extraction exploitation racket to profit the Crown and the Financiers in London
it is a grave error to attribute the (ulterior) motives of those who are motivated
and driven to grasp the Brass Ring of public power to "human nature"
The sweeps of his-story are not driven by "human nature" at all but by the
proclivities habituations preferences and psychosociopathies of the tiny elites
who fraudulently maneuver and manipulate their way into positions of power
in order to abuse that power to leverage their personal and ideological psychopathies
over millions of people.
The founders did not read his-story to be better founders or governors, but to engage
in their narcissistic egotistical dick-wagging
If their "reading of his-story" led them to:
Fraudulently portray "We the People" as pertaining to or even representing the unwashed hordes...
when in fact that term referred to the wealthy white male property-owning slave-owning members of the rentier class who participated in the whole Imperial Colonial project ...
Not as is claimed to "heroically cross the waters to the Promised Land and even more heroically
hew a civilization from the wilderness in order to provide a Land of Liberty and Prosperity for people who could flee the old world tyrannies
It quickly becomes evident that their reading and education was in the art of sophistry and fabrication